CAH selects individuals who are arts, humanities and/or business professionals, independent of CAH, to serve as advisory review panelists for each grant program. The role of a panelist is to review and score an eligible application’s content to the established grant program review criteria. CAH’s grant application evaluation process takes into consideration general standards of decency and respect for the diverse beliefs and values of the American public consistent with The National Foundation on the Arts and Humanities Act, as amended in 1990. For more information regarding the grant review process please visit the Guide to Grants. To volunteer or nominate a person to serve as an advisory review panelist for a grant program, see CAH’s Call for Panelists.
Section V.A: Criteria, Review and Selection Process
CAH can accept or deny any application. It will do so if it's in CAH's best interest. CAH will notify the applicant if it rejects that applicant’s proposal. CAH may pause or end an RFA. This would be due to its own grantmaking rule(s) or any federal regulation or requirement. CAH may do pre-award site visits. They do this to check the info in the application and see if the facilities are right for the services. If the RFA's terms conflict with any federal or local law or regulation, or any ambiguity about them, then the law or regulation wins. The applicant must ensure compliance.
Each application shall be reviewed as detailed below.
Category |
Criteria |
Weight |
Arts, Humanities and Content and/or Merit |
|
40% |
NE and/or SE Impact and Engagement
|
|
20% |
District Impact and Evaluation |
|
20% |
Financial Capacity, Management and Sustainability |
|
20% |
View Application and Submission Information <— | —> View Award Administration Information